1 hour ago, Cyber said:
I think you are missing the point and project goal.
I said unreasonable.
1 hour ago, Cyber said:
I think you are missing the point and project goal.
20 minutes ago, BruceMcF said:
It's about more than price point. It's an 8bit system with an 8bit processor driving an 8bit data bus. What would be the point of 24bit color support,for 1280x1024? How effectively could the 65c02 support it?
640x480 has a very real point: it allows 80 column text mode. Once that is hit (as some if not all 8bit systems did), the question becomes WHY raise the cost of the system with the next tier up FPGA in both number of available slices and available built in SRAM?
There's always "more" to be hit in terms of resolution, which is why they are now pushing consumers to "upgrade" to 4K TVs. To paraphrase Jurassic Park, "your computer scientists were so busy trying to find out how to do it, they forgot to ask WHETHER they should do it."
38 minutes ago, kelli217 said:
I said unreasonable.
5 hours ago, Robinkle said:
640x360 would be pixel perfect with HD, 1440p and 4K displays. I would like to know if this was considered. It makes sense mathematically at least.
11 hours ago, Robinkle said:
640x360 would be pixel perfect with HD, 1440p and 4K displays. I would like to know if this was considered. It makes sense mathematically at least.
On 2/22/2021 at 4:13 PM, codewar65 said:
640x480 is about all the VRAM on VERA can handle; and about what a 65x02 @ 8MHz can handle populating the VRAM in a timely manner.
On 2/22/2021 at 7:13 AM, codewar65 said:
640x480 is about all the VRAM on VERA can handle; and about what a 65x02 @ 8MHz can handle populating the VRAM in a timely manner.