Page 5 of 5

ODD Multiplexing?

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:23 am
by Travis Bryant moore


4 hours ago, svenvandevelde said:




My message was not addressed to you Travis. It was meant to be in general. I think your question demonstrated your creativity. Please don't feel limited asking your questions and ideas.



Thanks Just sleepy right now.


ODD Multiplexing?

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:24 am
by svenvandevelde


Just now, Travis Bryant moore said:




Thanks Just sleepy right now.



Zzzzz


ODD Multiplexing?

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2021 7:25 am
by StephenHorn


2 hours ago, svenvandevelde said:




May I ask why this question was pulled into this discussion? I honestly feel that previously asked questions are completely put out of context here. I'm sorry but if members of the community are not respected when asking questions and expressing their opinion, then how can this community thrive?



Just remember that there are people living in this world that may not be as smart and as great as many on this forum. So those people have a learning curve. 



On top, just remember that people asking stupid questions may actually be people very interested in the machine, and working hard and trying to make a great piece of code. Positively contributing to this community. 



So please accept my sincere apologies for having asked these questions and having learned from it. 



I thought we were all friends here. 



Sven, please accept my humblest apologies if that quote appeared targeted at you. It was not. My intent was simply to quote Lorin as an official source.


ODD Multiplexing?

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2021 12:12 pm
by svenvandevelde


4 hours ago, StephenHorn said:




Sven, please accept my humblest apologies if that quote appeared targeted at you. It was not. My intent was simply to quote Lorin as an official source.



Stephen. Thank you for your note. I'm sorry now that I misunderstood it. Vera is great and it's amazing. Learned a lot and let us continue the joined effort to build software for the X16 machine. Thanks again for the response.