Page 1 of 1
very basic kernel usage with disk files
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2024 11:39 pm
by PaulForgey
I have a simple assembly test program which should be the moral equivalent of this basic program:
10 OPEN 2,8,2,"BOGUS.TXT,S,R"
20 IF ST<>0 THEN GOTO 50
30 GET #2,A$:PRINT A$;
40 GOTO 20
50 PRINT:PRINT "ERROR";ST
60 CLOSE 2
Curiously, this program reads a $c7 before ST has $42 if the file does not exist.
The following assembly test program just emits an endless stream of CRs.
What am I doing wrong here?
.org $9000
READST =$ffb7
SETLFS =$ffba
SETNAM =$ffbd
OPEN =$ffc0
CHKIN =$ffc6
CHRIN =$ffcf
CHROUT =$ffd2
CLALL =$ffe7
GETIN =$ffe4
jmp start
error:
.byte 0
status:
.byte 0
start:
lda #13
ldx #<name
ldy #>name
jsr SETNAM
lda #2
ldx #8
ldy #2
jsr SETLFS
jsr OPEN
bcs onErr
ldx #2
jsr CHKIN
bcs onErr
loop:
jsr READST
cmp #0
bne onErr
jsr GETIN
bcs onErr
jsr CHROUT
bra loop
onErr:
sta error
jmp CLALL
name:
.str "bogus.txt,s,r"
Re: very basic kernel usage with disk files
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2024 3:14 am
by DragWx
When you run your assembly program, does the disk light start to blink? In the emulator, it'll be a red rectangle flashing in the upper right corner of the window. On actual hardware, it's an LED on the board itself.
Re: very basic kernel usage with disk files
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2024 3:28 am
by PaulForgey
ok that's a good reason to connect the drive light in my case, and retrospectively something that would be been obviously helpful... (this is real CX16 hardware but using the sd card).
I've since figured out that I must have had the logical file already open via prior runs as putting a call to CLALL at the beginning made things work, as RUN does.
So now my question is, shouldn't the call to OPEN have at least raised an error status? Or is it preferred to call READST regardless of carry? Some kernel reference says C is set on error from OPEN or CHKIN, others not.
Re: very basic kernel usage with disk files
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2024 3:29 am
by PaulForgey
One more question still remains: why am I reading one byte from a non-existent file before getting an error?
EDIT: answering myself, the error condition is not known until reading rather than at open.
Re: very basic kernel usage with disk files
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2024 4:12 am
by DragWx
When you "open" a file on the serial bus, any errors you get will be physical errors, like the device not responding. It doesn't matter whether the actual disk drive can find the file or not, as long as the command goes through and the drive responds, the Kernal considers the channel to be successfully opened, and you get no error.
To check for errors on the disk drive side of things (such as "file not found"), you need to open channel 15 on the disk drive and read its status report byte-by-byte. This will usually read back as "0, OK,0,0", but will say something different if there was an error, such as "62, FILE NOT FOUND,0,0". If everything opened without a hitch, then don't forget to CHKIN back to the file number you originally opened before you try reading.
The reason I asked about flashing indicators is, I suspect your assembler might be converting your string "bogus.txt,s,r" literally into PETSCII lowercase characters, which probably isn't what you want.
Re: very basic kernel usage with disk files
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2024 4:18 pm
by PaulForgey
makes total sense; at the kernel level we're dealing with the transport, and thus we attempt to read the first byte of the file in error before knowing there is an error.